Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 WI 22 - State v. Taylor

State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably State v. West (2011), State v. Kandutsch (2011)

28 state decisions

140200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County · 49 Wis. 2d 263 - McCleary v. State · State v. Gallion · 211 Wis. 2d 397 - State v. Setagord · 70 Wis. 2d 179 - Ocanas v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'is so excessive and unusual and so disproportionate to the offense committed as to shock public sentiment and violate the judgment of reasonable people concerning what is right and proper under the circumstances.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The standards governing appellate review of an imposed sentence are well settled. A circuit court exercises its discretion at sentencing, and appellate review is limited to determining if the court's discretion was erroneously exercised.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “contemplates a process of reasoning. This process must depend on facts that are of record or that are reasonably derived by inference from the record and a conclusion based on a logical rationale founded upon proper legal standards.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.