¶1¶ 57. {concurring). My understanding of the majority's opinion in this matter is that because the admission of the identification evidence in this case would not violate the defendant Hibl's right to due process, we need not and do not modify at this time this court's earlier decision in State v. Marshall, 92 Wis. 2d 101, 118, 284 N.W.2d 592 (1979). Majority op., ¶ 47. With that caveat, I join all but paragraph 46 of the majority's opinion.
2006 WI 52
State v. Hibl
Decided May 26, 2006
Wisconsin Supreme Court · decided 2006-05-26
Relies on 92 Wis. 2d 101 - State v. Marshall
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2006-05-26
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 2020
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →