State v. Tiepelman’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 86 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably State v. Harbor (2011), 326 Wis. 2d 685 - State v. Harris (2010)
2 federal appellate · 86 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · United States v. Tucker · Townsend v. Burke · United States Welch v. Lane · 217 Wis. 2d 392 - State v. Lechner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A defendant has a constitutionally protected due process right to be sentenced upon accurate information.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“formed part of the basis for the sentence.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“A defendant who requests resentencing due to the [trial] court's use of inaccurate information at the sentencing hearing 'must show both that the information was inaccurate and that the court actually relied on the inaccurate information in the sentencing.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.