Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 WI 9 - State v. Shomberg

State v. Shomberg’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
3
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

28 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chambers v. Mississippi · United States v. Nixon · Neder v. United States · Washington v. Texas · Pennsylvania v. Ritchie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'The question on appeal is not whether this court, ruling initially on the admissibility of the evidence, would have permitted it to come in, but whether the trial court exercised its discretion in accordance with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[O]ur review of a circuit court's use of its discretion is deferential, and we apply the erroneous exercise of discretion standard.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “an offer is only relevant to the state of mind of a person making the offer as long as the person making the offer believes that the test or analysis is possible, accurate, and admissible.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.