State v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738A
Relies on Faretta v. California · Gideon v. Wainwright · McKaskle v. Wiggins · United States v. Scheffer · Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A court's 'competency,' as the term is understood in Wisconsin, is not jurisdictional at all, but instead, is defined as 'the power of a court to exercise its subject matter jurisdiction' in a particular case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[e]xcept as otherwise provided by law, the [trial] court shall have original jurisdiction in all matters civil and criminal within this state.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'attempt to avoid, evade or deny the force and effect of a judgment in an indirect manner and not in a direct proceeding'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.