2006 WI App 142 - Larson v. Burmaster’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 2022
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Salerno · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · Troxel v. Granville · Goss v. Lopez · Meyer v. State of Nebraska
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The first prong of the vagueness test is concerned with whether the statute sufficiently warns persons "wishing to obey the law that [their] . .. conduct comes near the proscribed area." The second prong is con cerned with whether those who must enforce and apply the law may do so without creating or applying their own standards.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Even though Wisconsin courts have not specifically addressed this issue, the extensive federal case law in this area establishes that parents simply do not have a constitutional right to control each and every aspect of their children's education and oust the state's authority over that subject.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A]n appeal is frivolous if'[t]he party or the party's attorney knew, or should have known, that the appeal.. . was without any reasonable basis in law or equity and could not be supported by a good faith argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.