State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2007
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Michigan v. Long · State v. Williams · United States v. Evans · 141 Wis. 2d 302 - State v. Gomaz · United States v. Cochran
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“just for officer safety, not knowing what maybe he had been reaching for to either grab or to put down thinking it could possibly be a weapon that could injure us.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson“'furtive' or suspicious movements do not automatically give rise to an objectively reasonable suspicion that the occupant of the vehicle is armed and dangerous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson“observed [Johnson] make a strong furtive movement bending down as if he was reaching ... underneath the seat....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.