State v. Hemphill’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2022
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gross v. Hoffman · Wisconsin v. Laxton · 75 Wis. 2d 371 - Hart v. State · 206 Wis. 2d 199 - State v. Coleman · State v. Groth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a criminal defendant is entitled to a jury instruction on a theory of defense if: (1) the defense relates to a legal theory of defense, as opposed to an interpretation of evidence; (2) the request is timely made; (3) the defense is not adequately covered by other instructions; and (4) the defense is supported by sufficient evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lesik“fully and fairly inform the jury of the rules of law applicable to the case and . . . assist the jury in making a reasonable analysis of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lesik
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.