Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 WI App 263 - State v. Schulpius

2006 WI App 263 - State v. Schulpius’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 153 Wis. 2d 493 - State v. Poellinger · 202 Wis. 2d 620 - State v. Owen · State v. Lindgren · 215 Wis. 2d 696 - State v. Perry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “act, other than us[ing] a computerized communication system to communicate with”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “neighborhood for the specific purpose of meeting her and to get her interested in chatting again, and that he purchased condoms and made reference to those condoms in his computer communications. Id., ¶ 13. ¶ 23. Even if we assume that Schulpius's conduct in sending a picture is, for purposes of the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the non-computer-assisted act of driving through the area was 'to effect' [Schulpius's] 'intent' to have sex with the girl he knew as 'Meghan,' and thus satisfied the requirement in § 948.075(3).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.