State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 211 Wis. 2d 397 - State v. Setagord · Bruno v. Milwaukee County · 148 Wis. 2d 29 - Univest Corp. v. General Split Corp. · State v. Peters · State Ex Rel. Cramer v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[S]tatutory interpretation begins with the language of the statute. If the meaning of the statute is plain, we ordinarily stop the inquiry. Statutory language is given its common, ordinary, and accepted meaning, except that technical or specially-defined words or phrases are given their technical or special definitional meaning.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“shall be credited with service of his or her Wisconsin sentence .. . under the terms of s. 973.155 . ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Martinez“made [Lira] available to another jurisdiction”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.