Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 WI App 48 - State v. Yang

2006 WI App 48 - State v. Yang’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska · Pointer v. Texas · 153 Wis. 2d 493 - State v. Poellinger · 115 Wis. 2d 334 - State v. Pharr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'in accordance with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.