¶1specially concurring.
¶2[¶26] I concur. I write separately for the reasons set forth in my concurring opinion in Rohda v. State, 2006 WY 120, ¶¶ 28-29, 142 P.3d 1155, 1169 (Wyo.2006).
2006 WY 121
Schirber v. State
Decided September 27, 2006
Wyoming Supreme Court · decided 2006-09-27
Relies on Rohda v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2006-09-27
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2025
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →