¶1specially concurring.
¶2[¶ 13] I concur in the result of the majority opinion out of deference to the doctrine of stare decisis. See Rabuck v. State, 2006 WY 25, ¶ 34, 129 P.3d 861, 869 (Wyo.2006) (VOIGT, Justice, specially concurring).
2006 WY 134
Stokes v. State
Decided October 19, 2006
Wyoming Supreme Court · decided 2006-10-19
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 2011
1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Relies on Rabuck v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2006-10-19
View the full empirical analysis of this case →