Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 WY 148 - Fertig v. State

Fertig v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently January 2026 · most notably Lovato v. State (2010), Pier v. State (2019)

32 state decisions

140200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Mapp v. Ohio · Whren v. United States · United States v. Robinson · Atwater v. City of Lago Vista

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a traffic stop initiated by a law enforcement officer after personally observing a traffic violation is supported by probable cause and does not violate Article 1, Section 4 of the Wyoming Constitution, regardless of the officer's primary motivation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “scope, duration, and intensity of the seizure, as well as any search made by the police subsequent to [a] stop, remain subject to the strictures of Article 1, Section 4, and judicial review.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “We also find the rationale of Whren [v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 , 116 S.Ct. 1769 , 135 L.Ed.2d 89 (1996) ] persuasive in that we are not in a position to identify which traffic laws should be enforeed and which violations should be disregarded by law enforcement. Violations of the traffic code provide an objective standard by which to judge the reasonableness of a traffic stop seizure because an observed violation provides probable cause for a traffic stop seizure.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.