Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 WY 40 - Jones v. State

Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently July 2023

12 state decisions

60200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Satterwhite v. Texas · Blue v. United States · Chapman v. Pennsylvania · Mueller v. State · McArtor v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The [constitutional] issue does not raise jurisdictional concerns. There is a strong presumption in favor of the constitutionality of a statute. Giles v. State, 2004 WY 101, ¶ 10 , 96 P.3d 1027, 1080 (Wyo.2004). A trial court unquestionably has subject-matter jurisdiction over a controversy stemming from a violation of a state law that is presumptively valid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a right so fundamental in nature that the court must take cognizance of it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.