Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2007 ME 109 - Roberts v. Roberts

Roberts v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 2021

7 state decisions

30200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jarvis v. Jarvis · Boynton v. Adams · Sewall v. Saritvanich · Viles v. Town of Embden · State v. Dhuy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the alternative the notation of an order or judgment may consist of an incorporation by reference of a designated order, judgment, opinion or other document filed with the clerk by the court, provided that the notation shows that it is made at the specific direction of the court. The notation of an order or judgment shall show the date the notation is made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.