State v. Woo’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2024
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Lancellotti · State v. Ullring · Dawson v. State · State v. Barnard · State v. Kenney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the jury could have rationally found beyond a reasonable doubt that [the defendant] unlawfully trafficked in what was, in fact, a scheduled drug”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the jury [to] reasonably infer[] that [the defendant] successfully manufactured methamphetamine,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“and the drug is . . . [a] schedule W drug.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.