LHC, INC. v. Alvarez’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently December 2021 · most notably In re C.D.H. (2009), Edwards v. Cascade County (2009)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on James Talcott Construction, Inc. v. P&D Land Enterprises · Nason v. Leistiko · Marsh v. Overland · Donnes v. Orlando · Safeco Insurance v. Lovely Agency
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Each person who is entitled to recover damages certain or capable of being made certain by calculation and the right to recover that is vested in the person upon a particular day is entitled also to recover interest on the damages from that day except during the time that the debtor is prevented by law or by the act of the creditor from the debt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.