Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2007 MT 125 - State v. Doyle

State v. Doyle’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently November 2025

19 state decisions

90200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · City of Billings v. Bruce · State v. Beavers · Adams v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court allocates the total number of days of delay between the parties for the purpose of determining which party carries the burden of proof under the prejudice factor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We engage in a lengthy and difficult balancing process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.