Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2007 MT 229 - State v. Krum

State v. Krum’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 2025

18 state decisions

100200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Hicks · State v. Vernes · State v. Ruiz · State v. Armstrong · State v. McIntire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defendant has sufficient funds to pay a $5,000.00 assessment to the Park County Court Automation Fund, $2,500.00 to the TriCounty Network for Domestic Violence, and $2,500.00 to Park County Big Brothers and Sisters, all to give back to society and those who assist and help others who are victims of these type of offenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a district court has no power to impose a sentence in the absence of specific statutory authority.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.