State v. Kautzman’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently May 2025
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Olander · State v. Klose · State v. Osier · State v. Parisien · Davis v. Killu
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The depth and the magnitude of constitutional arguments require an individual making such a challenge to either prepare an adequate and thorough foundation to support the argument, or forego its presentation. ‘The mere reference to a statute’s constitutionality, with nothing more, does not meet the standard of persuasion required to mount an attack on constitutional grounds.’ ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Gaede v. Bertsch · State v. Peltier“[ Rule 33, providing for a motion for new trial] does not affect the power of the court to declare a mistrial and order a new trial prior to the verdict or finding of guilty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Thomas“When a problem occurs during trial, the affected party must bring the irregularity to the trial court's attention and seek the appropriate remedy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Thomas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.