Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2007 ND 143 - State v. Kunze

State v. Kunze’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Deck v. Missouri · James Edward Kennedy v. Harold J. Cardwell, Warden · United States v. Fields · 28 Cal. 4th 1201 - People v. Mar · United States v. Apodaca

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In cases ordering restraints decided by the district court after our decision in In re R.W.S. [ 2007 ND 37 , 728 N.W.2d 326 ], the district court is to make case-specific findings and explain on the record, and at greater length than in this case, its rationale for the order even in those instances in which the district court believes the reasons are readily apparent on the record. That explanation should include the reason for not accommodating a request for one type of restraint rather than the other when the reason is not obvious on the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.