Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2007 ND 162 - State v. Fasteen

State v. Fasteen’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2023

1 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

120200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Amerada Hess Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Tax Commissioner · Zimmerman v. North Dakota Department of Transportation Director · Wolf v. Estate of Seright · State v. Loh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Interpretation of a statute is a question of law fully renewable on appeal. Our primary goal in statutory construction is to ascertain the intent of the legislature, and we first look to the plain language of the statute and give each word of the statute its ordinary meaning. When the wording of a statute is clear and free of all ambiguity, the letter of it is not to be disregarded under the pretext of pursuing its spirit. If, however, the statute is ambiguous or if adherence to the strict letter of the statute would lead to an absurd or ludicrous result, a court may resort to extrinsic aids, such as legislative history, to interpret the statute. A statute is ambiguous if it is susceptible to meanings that are different, but rational. We presume the legislature did not intend an absurd or ludicrous result or unjust consequences, and we construe statutes in a practical manner, giving consideration to the context of the statutes and the purpose for which they were enacted.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “refers to the giving of a signal as an intention to turn or move right or left 'upon a roadway' as required under subseetion (1).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.