State v. Noack’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably Dieterle v. Dieterle (2013), Coughlin Construction Co. v. Nu-Tec Industries, Inc. (2008)
44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Faretta v. California · Houston v. Lack · Grant v. Cuellar · Klose v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“will not consider an argument that is not adequately articulated, supported, and briefed,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“At a minimum, a brief must contain a statement of the issues presented for review; a statement of the facts and, where those facts are disputed, references to the evidentiary record supporting the appellant’s statement of the facts; and the appellant’s legal argument, including the authorities on which the appellant relies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.