Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2007 ND 98 - State v. Flatt

State v. Flatt’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2022

8 state decisions

40200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Cummings · Reiling v. Bhattacharyya · State v. Rodriguez · Smith v. Baumgartner · State v. Bachmeier

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We have said retroactive application is disfavored because it creates new legal responsibilities based on past conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “No part of this code is retroactive unless it is expressly declared to be so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.