State v. Sayerwinnie’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 2026
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Denno · Watt v. Alaska · Arizona v. Manypenny · 194 Ill. 2d 485 - People v. Drum · State v. Newman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reflected a prudential concern that individuals should be free from the harassment and vexation of unbounded litigation by the sovereign.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[n]o appellate right by the government exists, absent express legislative intent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“order, decision, or judgment suppressing or excluding evidence,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.