Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2007 OKCR 29 - Eizember v. State

Eizember v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
2
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently October 2025 · most notably 2012 OK CR 7 - NELOMS v. State (2012), 59 Cal. 4th 830 - People v. Capistrano (2014)

4 federal appellate · 49 state decisions

330200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Wainwright v. Witt · Zant v. Stephens · Beck v. Alabama

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether the juror's views would prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. REECE v. STATE · REECE v. STATE
  2. “a) it is so closely connected to the charged offense as to form part of the entire transaction; b) it is necessary to give the jury a complete understanding of the crime; or c) when it is central to the chain of events.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. HAMMICK v. STATE · SHAW v. STATE
  3. “[i]n order to properly preserve for appellate review an objection to a denial of a challenge for cause, a defendant must demonstrate that he was forced over objection to keep an unacceptable juror.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. FREDERICK v. STATE · NOLEN v. STATE

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.