Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2007 OKCR 33 - Gomez v. State

Gomez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
3
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently October 2024

21 state decisions

100200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carroll v. United States · Chambers v. Maroney · United States v. Ross · Nix v. Williams · Harris v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It is well established that this State may grant protections to its citizens that are more expansive than those conferred by federal law." However, we have not chosen to do so. In addition, "this Court's independent interpretation of Oklahoma constitutional provisions is not circumscribed by United States Supreme Court interpretations of similar federal provisions." . . . But "if construction of federal constitutional provisions made by the United States Supreme Court appears to rest on 'sound principles,' the decisions of this Court construing equivalent provisions of the Oklahoma Constitution should harmonize with those of the United States Supreme Court construing the federal constitution."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “this Court's independent interpretation of Oklahoma constitutional provisions is not circumscribed by United States Supreme Court interpretations of similar federal provisions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “It is well established that this State may grant protections to its citizens that are more expansive than those conferred by federal law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.