Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2007 OK CR 6 - Smith v. State

2007 OK CR 6 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Matthews v. Price · McCraw v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]o insure that a defendant is not improperly denied counsel to which he or she is constitutionally entitled, the district court must make a record inquiring about the defendant's financial status[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he appointment of counsel for an indigent defendant is a fundamental right essential to a fair trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.