2007 Pa. Super. 187 - Commonwealth v. Hendricks’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 2005 Pa. Super. 372 - Commonwealth v. Sands · 2006 Pa. Super. 186 - Commonwealth v. Little · 2003 Pa. Super. 178 - Commonwealth v. Keller · 2001 Pa. Super. 26 - Commonwealth v. Packard · AB Ex Rel. Bennett v. SLIPPERY ROCK AREA SCHOOL DIST.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'evidence, read in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, that sufficiently establishes both the commission of a crime and that the accused is probably the perpetrator of that crime.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a] pre-trial habeas corpus motion is the proper means for testing whether the Commonwealth has sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case. To demonstrate that a prima facie case exists, the Commonwealth must produce evidence of every material element of the charged offense(s) as well as the defendant's complicity therein. To meet its burden, the Commonwealth may utilize the evidence presented at the preliminary hearing and also may submit additional proof.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.