2007 Pa. Super. 271 - Commonwealth v. King’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
December 2014
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McKnight v. Commonwealth · Commonwealth v. Widmer · Lavelle v. Koch · Commonwealth v. Simons · 364 Pa. Super. 521 - Commonwealth v. Gordon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If at any time during the course of the [discovery] proceedings it is brought to the attention of the court that a party has failed to comply [pretrial discovery and inspection], the court may order such party to permit discovery or inspection, may grant a continuance, or may prohibit such party from introducing evidence not disclosed, other than testimony of the defendant, or it may enter such other order as it deems just under the circumstances.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“this Court has held that dismissal of charges is a penalty far too drastic for a prosecutor's violation of discovery rules.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Com. v. AG
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.