2007 Pa. Super. 276 - Commonwealth v. B.C.’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jones v. United States · Commonwealth v. Wexler · Commonwealth v. Mulgrew · Commonwealth v. D.M. · 270 Pa. Super. 350 - Commonwealth v. Iacino
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“All the factors listed in Wexler , and similar additional considerations, should be evaluated in expunction cases which are terminated without conviction for reasons such as nolle prosequi or ARD.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“we may not merely close our eyes to the whole thrust of the expungement process, i.e., to exculpate an innocent individual from the jaws of unwarranted punishment which manifests itself and flows from the retention of one's arrest record”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity means that the defendant did commit the act, but because of his mental illness he cannot be legally responsible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Com. v. VG
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.