2007 Pa. Super. 360 - Commonwealth v. Barber’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2022
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Blockburger v. United States · United States v. Dixon · Albernaz v. United States · Grady v. Corbin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well settled in Pennsylvania that a defendant is entitled to an immediate interlocutory appeal as of right from an order denying a non-frivolous motion to dismiss on state or federal double jeopardy grounds.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) the former prosecution resulted in an acquittal or conviction; (2) the current prosecution was based on the same criminal conduct or arose from the same criminal episode; (3) the prosecutor in the subsequent trial was aware of the charges before the first trial; and (4) the instant charges and the former charges were within the jurisdiction of a single court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.