2007 Pa. Super. 367 - Gaston v. Minhas’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on K.H. v. J.R. · K.H. v. J.R. · 414 Pa. Super. 372 - In Re MT · 2006 Pa. Super. 16 - Capoferri Ex Rel. Capoferri v. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · 2003 Pa. Super. 480 - Nykiel v. Heyl
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The foregoing provisions of subdivisions (b) and (c) apply, of course, only to documents which are prepared by a person who is within the subpoena power of the court in which the action is pending. The special relaxation of the rules of evidence is conditioned on the power of the opponent to subpoena the person whose testimony is waived; if that is not possible, for territorial or other reasons, the foundation for the special rule disappears, and the proponent must follow the normal rules of evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.