2007 Pa. Super. 379 - Commonwealth v. Boyd’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Shiffler · Commonwealth v. Dickerson · 1999 Pa. Super. 31 - Moses v. T.N.T. Red Star Express · Commonwealth v. Vasquez · 125 Pa. Super. 407 - Commonwealth v. Sutton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(3) A person who is convicted of violating section 13(a)(14), (30) or (37) of The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act ... shall, upon conviction, be sentenced to a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment and a fine as set forth in this subsection:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.