2007 Pa. Super. 70 - Kulp v. Kulp’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pettigrew v. Pettigrew · 278 Pa. Super. 141 - Novelli v. Carroll · 384 Pa. Super. 210 - Griffin v. Griffin · 2006 Pa. Super. 253 - Johnson v. Johnson · 2004 Pa. Super. 82 - Radakovich v. Radakovich
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he issue is an extremely sensitive one. While the division of cremated remains may be common in the funeral industry and may be acceptable in many instances to the next of kin, in other cases, as in the case of Husband herein, the next of kin may believe that the division of cremated remains is offensive. The question thus presented is whether the trial court in the instant case abused its discretion in ordering the division of Son’s remains.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wilson v. Wilson“review an order disposing of a petition for special relief under an abuse of discretion standard of review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.