Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2007 SD 11 - Glover v. Krambeck

Glover v. Krambeck’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2023

13 state decisions

60200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kane v. Magna Mixer Co. · Black Hills Jewelry Manufacturing Co. v. Felco Jewel Industries, Inc. · Hall v. General Motors Corp. · Dacy v. Gors · Augustin v. Mughal

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The applicability of the doctrine of res judicata is a question of law examined de novo. “ ‘The doctrine of res judicata serves as claim preclusion to prevent relitigation of an issue actually litigated or which could have been properly raised and determined in a prior action.’ ” “ ‘For purposes of res judicata, a cause of action is comprised of the facts which give rise to, or establish, the right a party seeks to enforce.... [T]he test is a query into whether the wrong sought to be redressed is the same in both actions.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The doctrine of res judicata serves as claim preclusion to prevent relitigation of an issue ... which could have been properly raised and determined in a prior action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.