State v. Condon’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently April 2021
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. · United States v. Morrow · State v. Jacob · State v. Guthrie · State v. Burtzlaff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e have recognized that a courtroom identification is not necessary when the evidence is sufficient to establish the inference that the defendant is the person who committed the crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Podzimek“we review the circuit court's findings of fact under the clearly erroneous standard, [and] we give no deference to its conclusions of law [.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re HLS“based on the perception of the witness to an event, not the education or experience the witness possesses prior to the event.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Scott
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.