Larson v. Larson’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 2022
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Grode v. Grode · Hanks v. Hanks · Behrens v. Wedmore · Johnson v. Johnson · Wallahan v. Wallahan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he origin of the "hard evidence" language indicates that [our precedents] should not be read to require the trial court to reject proposed valuations of marital assets simply because they are based on a party's personal opinion . This language more accurately serves as a reminder that it is the duty of the parties, not the trial court, to produce competent evidence regarding the value of their property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Taylor v. Taylor“a court is not required to accept either party's proposed valuation”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Taylor v. Taylor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.