Taylor v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably Archuleta v. Galetka (2011), Honie v. State (2014)
41 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Crawford v. Washington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'We review an appeal from an order dismissing or denying a petition for post-conviction relief for correctness without deference to the lower court's conclusions of law.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“[when confronted with ineffective assistance of counsel claims, we review a lower court's purely factual findings for clear error, but [we] review the application of the law to the facts for correctness.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“considering the totality of the questioning, counsel was afforded an adequate opportunity to gain the information necessary to evaluate jurors.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.