Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2007 UT 23 - State v. Duran

State v. Duran’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 2025

9 state decisions

50200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Payton v. New York · Mincey v. Arizona · Texas v. Brown · United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan · Minnesota v. Olson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that although the odor of marijuana ... gave rise to probable cause for a search, it did not create exigent circumstances that would justify the[] warrantless search of the trailer.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “must be accompanied by some evidence that the suspects are disposing of the evidence, as opposed to casually consuming it,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he costs that would accompany a merger of consumption of contraband and destruction of evidence — i.e., an increase in questionable warrantless searches, a corresponding decrease in personal privacy, a decreased incentive for law enforcement to seek a warrant before conducting a search, and a further erosion of Fourth Amendment protections — outweigh the benefits accruing to the state in more efficient law enforcement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.