Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2007 UT 53 - Benvenuto v. State

Benvenuto v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hill v. Lockhart · Tollett v. Henderson · George Smith Warden v. Lee Robbins · Banks v. Reynolds

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a reasonable proba bility that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the petitioner had ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of the United States Constitution or Utah Constitution.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “first show that his counsel was objectively unreasonable in failing to find arguable issues to appeal-that is, that counsel unreasonably failed to discover nonfrivolous issues and to file a merits brief raising them. If [a petitioner] succeeds in such a showing, he then has the burden of demonstrating prejudice. That is, he must show a reasonable probability that, but for his counsel's unreasonable failure to file a merits brief, he would have prevailed on his appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.