Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2007 UT 70 - State v. Gardner

State v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Boyd · S.B.D. v. State · State v. Krukowski · Bawden & Associates v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[ AJn appellate court can rely on the presumption that the jury disbelieved the evidence in conflict with the jury verdict and find that there is evidence suffi-client to support the jury's findings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] sufficiency of the evidence inquiry ends if there is some evidence, including reasonable inferences, from which findings of all the requisite elements of the crime can reasonably be made.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “If anything material to either party is omitted from the record by error or accident or is misstated, the parties by stipulation, the trial court, or the appellate court, either before or after the record is transmitted, may direct that the omission or misstatement be corrected and if necessary that a supplemental record be certified and transmitted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.