State v. Ross’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably State v. Maestas (2012), State v. Nielsen (2014)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Allen v. Wright · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Kolender v. Lawson · Whitmore v. Arkansas · Godfrey v. Georgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To prevail under plain error review, a defendant must demonstrate that [1] an error exists; [2] the error should have been obvious to the trial court; and [8] the error is harmful, ie., absent the error, there is a reasonable likelihood of a more favorable outcome.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Redcap · State v. Duran“call to the attention of ... jurors matters which they would not be justified in considering in determining their verdict,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Wright · State v. Olola“[i]f prose-cutorial misconduct is established, the State must show that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bond · State v. Duran
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.