Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2007 UT 90 - Bluemel v. State

Bluemel v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 2020

11 state decisions

50200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Parke v. Raley · Adams v. State · Bear River Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wall · Salazar v. Warden, Utah State Prison · Bluemel v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On certiorari, we review .... the court of appeals' decision for correctness and give its conclusions of law no deference.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “). . State v. Alexander, 2009 UT App 188, ¶¶ 12-13 , 214 P.3d 889 . . Id. ¶¶ 12-14; see also Urax R.Crm. P. 11(e)(4)(A) ('The court ... may not accept the [guilty] plea until the court has found ... [that] the defendant understands the nature and elements of the offense to which the plea is entered, that upon trial the prosecution would have the burden of proving each of those elements beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the plea is an admission of all those elements.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Because a guilty plea involves the waiver of several constitutional rights, a guilty plea is not valid under the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution unless it is knowing and voluntary.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.