2007 UT App 116 - State v. Jimenez’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2023
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Dunn · State v. Rimmasch · State v. Bluff · State v. Bullock · State v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the court shall consider the gravity and cirenmstances of the offenses, the number of victims, and the history, character, and rehabilitative needs of the defendant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Because trial counsel's decision not to object 'was reasonable in light of his trial strategy, we do not address [Dle-fendant's plain-error arguments... .'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cunningham“because counsel did not want to draw further attention to the [evidence]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.