2007 UT App 13 - State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently April 2025
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Dunn · Specht v. Jensen · State v. Bankston · Moore v. United States · State v. Jamison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“those portions of the expert witnesses' testimony to which defendant objects quite clearly state legal conclusions because the witnesses tie their opinions to the requirements of Utah law.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“danger that a juror may turn to the [witness's legal conclusion] rather than the judge for guidance on the applicable law,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“blur the separate and distinct responsibilities of the judge, jury and witness,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.