State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2020
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Holgate · United States v. Rivera · State v. Davis · State v. Clark
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Iwle assume, without deciding, that the prosecutor's statement that [Otterson] was a liar was improper and therefore [Otterson]'s lawyer should have objected to those statements,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[ We] will not overturn a jury verdict for the admission of improper evidence if the admission of the evidence did not reasonably [alf-feet the likelihood of a different verdict.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“no prejudice resulted from this error because the trial record is replete with [Otter-son]'s inconsistent statements.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.