2007 UT App 238 - State v. Bernards’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Fedorowicz · State v. Allen · State v. Bell · State v. Wilcox · State v. Menzies
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A defendant is entitled to a bill of particulars ‘only when the information or-indictment is constitutionally deficient by reason of its failure to inform of the nature and cause of the offense charged/”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“requires the prosecution to state the charge with sufficient specificity to protect the defendant from multiple prosecutions for the same crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Klenz“not demonstrated that the State withheld or attempted to withhold any information it had regarding the dates of the charged offenses”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Klenz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.