2007 UT App 264 - State v. Wengreen’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. James · State v. Pinder · State v. Montoya · Manning v. State · State v. Casey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`Prosecutorial misconduct occurs when the prosecutor's comments call the jurors' attention to matters not proper for their consideration and when the comments have a reasonable likelihood of prejudicing the jury by significantly influencing its verdict.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Buck“such that there is a reasonable likelihood the jury would have reached a more favorable result absent the comments.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Buck
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.